Supplier risk assessment is not about completely removing risk from your supply chain. Firstly, that is not possible. Any company that depends on suppliers has some degree of supplier risk. Furthermore, it is not necessarily advisable, particularly for companies that focus on innovation and bringing new products to market.
Having said that, ignoring supplier risk is not an option either. Your suppliers have the ability to derail your production schedules, destroy customer confidence, and damage your reputation.
Therefore, you do need to have a clear understanding of risk across your supply network. You should have visibility into the types of risks each supplier potentially poses to your organization. In addition, you should know how much risk is acceptable to your department and to your company overall.
However, quantifying risk across different suppliers, in different parts of the world, quickly becomes a daunting task. How do you compare a seat manufacturer in China, with a steering wheel maker in Canada? What metrics should you use when you source strawberries from the United States, coffee beans from Ethiopia, and dairy milk from France?
This is where using strategic supplier risk scoring becomes invaluable.
The strategic supplier risk score is a standardized numerical rating. It quantifies the diverse risks associated with a specific supplier facility in a specific location.
The strategic risk score can combine both external risks and internal metrics. These are weighted to what is most important to your company.
This standardization allows for a true comparison between suppliers, even when they face vastly different threats.
However, this article concentrates on external risks. More precisely, here we are looking at how risks can differ depending on supplier locations.
The Spectrum of Location-Based Risks
Sometimes supplier risk is less dependent on who your suppliers are, but where they are. This is why strategic supplier risk scoring must include location-based risk factors.
Location-based risks vary around the world. Tornados, for example, are more frequent and more destructive in the United States than tornados in the United Kingdom. While forced labor can happen anywhere in the world, we know that it is more likely in certain regions, such as Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
Location-based risk factors can be grouped into several key categories, each representing a different facet of potential disruption.
- Natural disasters
- Political violence
- Socio-political
- Operational
- Sustainability
- Risks to individuals
- Tax, economic and legal
- Climate risk
As you can see, location-based risks are diverse. Plus, they can change over time. Formerly peaceful regions can experience uprisings; extreme weather events can damage operational infrastructure; regulations can change.
Before awarding a contract to a supplier, you should know which production facility will be used to manufacture your parts. You can use location-based risk scores to understand the potential pitfalls by working with suppliers in different parts of the world.
Furthermore, you can use location-based risk scores to determine unacceptable risk thresholds. For example, you could decide that a region prone to flooding is a tolerable risk, but a history of political instability or civil unrest is not.